Shane Scott-Hamblen:
The agenda I would set for the next 25 years in the Episcopal Church would be the one I wish we had set all along. Namely, I would have us be “the servants of the servants of God”. For too long we ruled over peoples lives in an imperial style. We settled on power from fear (for example of Hell and Judgment) rather than on the stronger power which comes from respect and integrity.
We lacked humility in making up answers to the mysteries of God and now people are smart enough to have figured out that we don’t really know there are “pearly gates” or feathers on angels’ wings. Quite often we tried to convince people that we knew Christ’s will – and quite often his will sounded just like ours.
I would have us be humble and honest in our teaching and our service to God and people. It takes a great deal of security to admit “We don’t know but we believe…”. When people ask us to do something for them, our answer should usually be “yes” because we automatically assume it is the Spirit which has lead them to ask in the first place.
Our model should be Christ kneeling and washing the disciples’ feet not imperial power looking down on them. How many times, and in how many ways, did he try and teach us the highest shall be brought low and the lowest shall be raised up?
If we can show the world the genuine happiness that comes from humble service then they might once again respect our humility and integrity. If they once again come to respect our humility, wisdom, love, and holy integrity then they might want to join us in the joy of washing other peoples’ feet – which we believe is a way of washing God’s feet (“entertaining angels unawares”). In short, I would have us be a much more “intentional” community striving for quality rather than quantity.
Barbara Crafton:
Reading Shane’s response, I am moved and filled with hope: he is much younger than I am, and he makes me feel that the church is in good hands with his generation.
So many things are true, and I hope we emphasize them in future:
- Our relationships are more important than our opinions.
- The main thrust of our faith is love of God and love of neighbor. The rest in commentary.
- Care for the poor is not an option for some of us; it is a duty for all of us.
- Living in Christ every day is more important than being able to define Christ once and for all.
- God is a mystery. We’re not going to be able to understand God, and this is okay.
- This life is not all there is.
- People of faith can and do disagree about important things.
- Most people don’t want to fight our religious wars.
- The church doesn’t have to stay the same. It never has.
- The primary faith experience of most Christians happens in the local community.
Milind Sojwal:
Issues that I would hold vital for the church to explore and strengthen for the next 25 years would be the following and not necessarily in any order.
1. Evangelism and Mission. The church that is not committed to a proclamation of the gospel of Christ, in word and deed, is a church doomed. The bold proclamation of the life and death and resurrection of Jesus has to be central to our life and we need to recapture the power of the dreaded “E” word. I have seen church bulletins which state that “all people are welcome to this church and you are safe from any attempt on our part to convert you.” I say no. Nobody that walks into our church should be safe from an attempt at sharing Jesus in all his beauty with them, that they are compelled by him and drawn to him. We need to collaborate with people from other denominations and other faiths to fight injustice, and be engaged in dismantling structures that enable them. We need to be radically committed to sharing our resources sacrificially with those of lesser means around the globe.
2. Attract and keep young people in the church. We are a church that needs to find creative ways to make the church appealing to the young. We have to learn to question, adapt and innovate. We have to attract younger people to ministry–lay and ordained.
3. Teach scripture and the spiritual disciplines to our congregations. Our church is notoriously biblically illiterate. We need to teach our people to read, interpret and love God’s word for it changes lives. WE need to teach our people to pray, to study scripture, to practice generosity, to engage in solitude. We need to equip our congregations to develop its inner life so that its outward life is sustainable.
4. Celebrate our theological and liturgical diversity. We need more forums for discussions over the difficult issues of our times. We need to do this with openness and genuine respect for others beliefs. We need to recognize that we ALL have something to learn from people who differ from us and that when we engage in deep, non-judgmental listening, we grow and we create space for those who differ from us to feel welcomed. Our communion-wide internecine battles have to stop and we have to grow in humility and not allow our disproportionately higher wealth and power to dominate the little guys in our communion.


#2
Peggy I agree with you, I want to see us genuinely equip disciples to face challenges and not find ways around them!! How true!! Why are we wishy washy on certain things? Why do we let certain questions go un-answered because it's easier? Let's not throw out all the dogma's!
At our home one night we were watching a Christian film ( Flywheel ) with relatives and people of our church. When my sister-in-law who is Jewish asked what we really believe in, one of our church members came back right on target with who we are and exactly what we believe…….and I said to myself, yes, yes that's it. We need to hear that more so we all can say what it is being anglican really stands for.
I hope we can continue this forum because I believe it is a great discussion!
Did everyone read the editorial "Can Liberal Christianity Be Saved?" yesterday in the Times? I believe that is what we are talking about here. The loss of church members due to becoming too liberal. Having no "dogma" is exactly what I thought as I began reading it and the writer confirmed four paragraphs later.
This is backed by the recent offering of the Via Media program in our church. It filled up the first Sunday we announced it and had a waiting list!! People are hungry; to be feed spiritually and we found that feeding them together at a common table really answered many of their needs!! I think it's just another way of showing that people are looking for guidance and answers.
It's not enough to just be all encompassing, all inclusive. Yes that is part of who we are but does it dilute us also? What is our primary purpose? Is it personal and selfish? Or should it be more like Peggy suggests in bringing Jesus to our fellow mankind? What if you were the only Bible someone heard????
I've appreciated all the commentary here and agree with Milind Sojwal that we need to be better educated as to scripture and incorporate that into the integral brain trust — at the same time less "insular" in our communications practices — or make it all so intriguing that those outside will really be dying to know what we mean when we say "dinner followed by Compline." (i.e, the Starbucks practice – you ordered what? I've GOT TO HAVE THAT!) Passion is missing, and while I don't have any answers I will speak to what I'm passionate about and that is the incorporation and value of imagery and art within within contemporary Episcopal practice and liturgical practice — I know we are all on limited budgets and I appreciate so much the Episcopal Cafe and ECVA but I find we have very little support for visual innovation (or yes I could be clueless) — and while I love MUSIC and am not making this an either/or discussion, the fact is we are entering a new era, the Gutenberg press of imagery – a new hieroglyphics where word and image can connect from the wall the web to the world and we are not harnessing that. I believe there is commercial potential here. We live in a new age where everyone is an artist – get them involved in projects that bring their imagery into the larger conversation – not just a silly art show – a larger concept like a workshop where you make psalms together in today's new medium – we are weighed down by old stained glass windows (which I love!) but we must find a way into the new. I hope i don't get excommunicated for this and I know it's hard to understand but I'd like to get this discussion on the table. There is an arts movement happening out there and why shouldn't we lead the way – more than an arts movement, a communications explosion — in dire need of some glue to bring sense and meaning to it all — otherwise it's all just a bunch of stuff and more stuff. Spiritual and art together could bring real meaning to the morass and perhaps revitalize our Episcopal content which is yes, so rich. We need to yes keep what we have but morph into the new. We're in a budgeted landscape but if we don't enter the new language and make our own a part of it, we're sunk.
Bill, I wish you'd say more here– what do you have in mind, both the inhibiting structures and the resources in hand to become the flexible community a new (unchurched) century requires. Deb Jacoby-Twigg makes some concrete recommendations.
No disagreements with all that is said above, but I think we need to get clear that many of our longstanding institutional structures inhibit us from moving in the direction we need to go. Much is being batted about right now about reforming TEC's church-wide structures to enable more to be accomplished on a diocesan and/or local level. That's a terrific idea, but we need to have that same kind of conversation about structure on the diocesan/local level. God has blessed us with many resources… but are those resources well-placed to make us the intentional, relational, evangelical church that our principal speakers envision? Are we ready to put our considerable resources in the service of that vision? I sure hope so!
The setting of an AGENDA makes me mindful that their are likely to be the Episcopal equivalent of Super-Pacs supporting one agenda or another. I think rather that we need to turn to Jesus and scripture for the answer:
Matthew 22:35-40
35 Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying,
36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law? {i.e. What is our Agenda}
37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
38 This is the first and great commandment.
39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
If we can try to do that, and then share our own brand of worship not because it is the only way but because it is our way to worship in the beauty of holiness, we'll be just fine.
We tend to take fundamentals for granted and then wonder why we have the problems we have. Back to basics: evangelism, mission, biblical literacy (christian education), stewardship, study/fix why we don't attract youth and men in representative proportions. Ask how smart it is to offer liturgy that assumes pre-existing belief when America is on its 3rd generation of mostly unchurched people. Look seriously at everything written by Brian McLaren. Overhaul our seminary education programs with a view to all of the above…
I agree with what has already been said. We need to be clearer and more articulate about the practice of our relationship to God and our understanding of the Bible and how Christian discipleship that is lived in practice finds its foundation in Biblical teaching (and specifically Jesus’ teaching) and develops strong faith. I want to see us genuinely equip disciples to face challenges and not find ways around them. I want to take seriously having the same mind as Jesus-being transformed and ready, willing and able to heal the sick and feed the poor and change all forms of oppression. It may sound naive but I want us to hunker down and be real about God’s mission and get up and be courageous followers of Jesus and bring all things in our own lives under Christ.
What Milind says about Biblibal illiteracy is so true. There's a project afoot and gaining strength to encourage the reading of scripture called The Bible Challenge — participants will read the entire Bible in the course of one year! Here's where you can find more information: http://thecenterforbiblicalstudies.org
The present day watchword is think globally and live locally. Well, I would say that the church needs a long term plan nationally and locally, and a short term plan to workable capsule with time frame and feed backs every regular interval to assess its progress, and great vision to see the dream come true, as guide line.
The Church is the gathering of the people of God, and Episcopal is the denomination that helps the people to come together to worship God in Spirit and in truth. in twenty years there can be lot of episcopacy change, so first the and vision of the leader is very important. Otherwise all these would be just back and white of no meaning. The Executive of the church have to people of visionary, and the local church vestries are the roots and life giving system, and not life support of any church.
Vision has to come from dream of the people and officials, like one see in the Bible dream of great tomorrow of wonderful life emanating and enriching principles based on bible and praxis oriented in every means. Any church without mission is dead, therefore its mission emancipating human person, correcting the system, and be life giving agents are the core principals to be chalked out in long term and make its make its workable modules is the arms of the mission.
The arms would be the christian education of the church, the music department, the youth ministry, the philanthropic activities, and social action as corrective agents. The church should come up with a R&D department to improve its system to the time and think with the fast changing world. Use the information technology to enhance its worship and coordinate the clergy as a community and their ministry.
An open church to reach out, reinterpret the Bible to the present time and help to re-read it.